-
RESEARCH
Coping with child violencein primary care: how do professionals perceive it?
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2017;70(1):119-125
01-01-2017
Abstract
RESEARCHCoping with child violencein primary care: how do professionals perceive it?
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2017;70(1):119-125
01-01-2017DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0009
Views0See moreABSTRACT
Objective:
to know the perception of health professionals working in primary care about child violence, since this has increased progressively in the world, requiring every effort to intervene.
Method:
this is a qualitative, descriptive and exploratory study performed through interviews with professionals in primary care in a health district of São Paulo. The Alceste tool was used for analysis of data from the speeches.
Results:
perceptions of professionals point to the limits and difficulties of the care network with coping; need for intersectoral action; violence situations identified within the caresetting; and causes and effects of violence on child development.
Conclusion:
there is need for qualified training of workers, health network organization for the provision of quantity and quality of care services, and financial resources for coping with child violence.
-
RESEARCH
Religious and spiritual coping in people living with HIV/Aids
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2017;70(2):392-399
01-01-2017
Abstract
RESEARCHReligious and spiritual coping in people living with HIV/Aids
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2017;70(2):392-399
01-01-2017DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2015-0170
Views0See moreABSTRACT
Objective:
evaluate the religiosity and the religious/spiritual coping of people living with HIV/Aids.
Method:
descriptive, cross-sectional study with quantitative approach, conducted in a reference HIV/Aids outpatient clinic in a university hospital of Recife-PE, Brazil, from June to November 2015. At total of 52 people living with HIV/Aids (PLWHA) participated in the research, which employed own questionnaire, the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL), and the Religious/Spiritual Coping Scale (RCOPE).
Results:
the sample presented high indices of organizational religiosity (4.23±1.66), non-organizational religiosity (4.63±1.50), and intrinsic religiosity (13.13±2.84). Positive RCOPE was used in high mean scores (3.66±0.88), and negative RCOPE had low use (2.12 ± 0.74). In total, use of RCOPE was high (3.77±0.74), having predominated the positive RCOPE (NegRCOPE/PosRCOPE ratio=0.65±0.46).
Conclusion:
it is evident the importance of encouraging religious activity and RCOPE strategies, seen in the past as inappropriate interventions in clinical practice.