-
RESEARCH
Construction and validation of clinical contents for development of learning objects
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2018;71(2):306-313
01-01-2018
Abstract
RESEARCHConstruction and validation of clinical contents for development of learning objects
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2018;71(2):306-313
01-01-2018DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0622
Views0See moreABSTRACT
Objective:
to describe the process of construction and validation of clinical contents for health learning objects, aimed at patients in the treatment of head and neck cancer.
Method:
descriptive, methodological study. The development of the script and the storyboard were based on scientific evidence and submitted to the appreciation of specialists for validation of content. The agreement index was checked quantitatively and the suggestions were qualitatively evaluated.
Results:
The items described in the roadmap were approved by 99% of expert experts. The suggestions for adjustments were inserted in their entirety in the final version. The free-marginal kappa statistical test, for multiple evaluators, presented value equal to 0.68%, granting a substantial agreement.
Conclusion:
The steps taken in the construction and validation of the content for the production of educational material for patients with head and neck cancer were adequate, relevant and suitable for use in other subjects.
-
RESEARCH
Head and neck cancer: validation of a data collection instrument
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2018;71(4):1899-1906
01-01-2018
Abstract
RESEARCHHead and neck cancer: validation of a data collection instrument
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2018;71(4):1899-1906
01-01-2018DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0227
Views0See moreABSTRACT
Objective:
construct and validate the content of an instrument to collect data from patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) served in a specialty clinic.
Method:
methodological study consisting of four steps. The first step consisted in the preparation of the instrument using databases and the theoretical model of Marjory Gordon. In the second and third steps the content was validated by eight nursing judges. The evaluation used the Content Validity Index (CVI). The fourth step consisted in a pilot test with seventeen HNC patients.
Results:
of the 88 questions formulated and organized on the dimensions of structure and process submitted to validation, items with CVI lower than 0.80 were excluded. The final instrument was composed of 56 items, with global CVI calculated as 0.87.
Conclusion:
the final instrument presented content validity for data collection in head and neck clinic.