Interviews Archives - Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem

  • 01-01-2018

    Case study: using participatory photographic methods for the prevention of medication errors

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2018;71(5):2483-2488

    Abstract

    Case study: using participatory photographic methods for the prevention of medication errors

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2018;71(5):2483-2488

    DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0040

    Views0

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    To describe the experience of using participatory photographic research methods to engage nurses and researchers in a collaborative study to improve medication safety conditions, particularly in patients with feeding tubes in a nursing home for the elderly (NHE).

    Method:

    This qualitative study was conducted in Brazil and proceeded in iterative phases of visual and textual data collection and analysis. Interviews, subsequent nurse-led photo-narrated walkabouts, and photo elicitation were used with nurses.

    Results:

    The need to transform the work design and the workplace to improve medication safety and improving medication processes through effective communication was identified. Unsafe workforce is a challenge in achieving safe medication administration practices; and lack of a patient safety culture is a barrier for adaptive learning and growth.

    Conclusion:

    Our findings demonstrated the effectiveness of a restorative research approach for supporting nurses to study and act on medication safety.

    See more
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Case study: using participatory photographic methods for the prevention of medication errors

Search

Search in:

Article type
Article type
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report
correction
correction
editorial
letter
letter
other
other
research-article
research-article
retraction
review-article
review-article
Section
Section
AUTHORS'S ANSWER
CASE STUDY
EDITORIAL
ERRATUM
EXPERIENCE REPORT
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
REFLECTION
RESEARCH
RETRACTION
REVIEW
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
Year / Volume
Year / Volume
2024; v.77
2023; v.76
2022; v.75
2021; v.74
2020; v.73
2019; v.72
2018; v.71
2017; v.70
2016; v.69
2015; v.68
ISSUE
ISSUE