Medical Errors Archives - Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE01-01-2019

    Nursing students’ errors in clinical learning. Qualitative outcomes in Mixed Methods Research

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2019;72(1):170-176

    Abstract

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    Nursing students’ errors in clinical learning. Qualitative outcomes in Mixed Methods Research

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2019;72(1):170-176

    DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0592

    Views0

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    to analyze factors associated with nursing students' errors during clinical learning, and their perceptions regarding these events and the opportunity for learning and development provided by them.

    Method:

    Convergent Mixed Method design according Creswell and Clark. Qualitative dimension included face to face and internet interviews. Data analysis followed Miles and Huberman method.

    Results:

    Nursing student's errors were revealed according to their perceptions. They occurred in all phases of the nursing process and in transversal skills. Errors were acknowledged as learning and developmental opportunities.

    Final considerations:

    Students acknowledged their errors and ascribe to themselves reasons and what could have prevented what happened. Mixed Method was a very adequate design to study phenomena. Qualitative dimension was essential to reveal and achieve the objectives. Suggestions founded on the findings are presented.

    See more
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Nursing students’ errors in clinical learning. Qualitative outcomes in Mixed Methods Research

Search

Search in:

Article type
Article type
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report
correction
correction
editorial
letter
letter
other
other
research-article
research-article
retraction
review-article
review-article
Section
Section
AUTHORS'S ANSWER
CASE STUDY
EDITORIAL
ERRATUM
EXPERIENCE REPORT
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
REFLECTION
RESEARCH
RETRACTION
REVIEW
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
Year / Volume
Year / Volume
2024; v.77
2023; v.76
2022; v.75
2021; v.74
2020; v.73
2019; v.72
2018; v.71
2017; v.70
2016; v.69
2015; v.68
ISSUE
ISSUE