Organ Dysfunction Scores Archives - Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    Evaluation of the performance of the modified early warning score in a Brazilian public hospital

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2019;72(6):1428-1434
    10-21-2019

    Abstract

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    Evaluation of the performance of the modified early warning score in a Brazilian public hospital

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2019;72(6):1428-1434
    10-21-2019

    DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0537

    Views0

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    To evaluate the performance of the modified early warning score (Mews) in a nursing ward for patients in clinical deterioration.

    Method:

    This is an analytical, quantitative and predictive study. Mews’ parameters (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature and level of consciousness) were evaluated every six hours. The following events were reported: death, cardiopulmonary arrest and transfer to intensive care. The evaluations were performed in a hospital of reference in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

    Results:

    A total of 300 patients were included (57 ± 18 years old, males: 65%). There number of combined events was observed to be greater the higher the score’s value (00%; 00%; 01; 09%; 19%; 28%; 89%, respectively, for Mews 0; 1; 2; 3; 4; 5 and 6; p < 0.0001). Mews ≥ 4 was the most appropriate cut-off point for prediction of these events (sensitivity: 87%, specificity: 85% and accuracy: 0.86).

    Conclusion:

    Mews properly measured the occurrence of severe events in hospitalized patients of a Brazilian public hospital’s nursing ward. Mews ≥ 4 seems to be the most appropriate cut-off point for prediction of these events.

    See more
    Evaluation of the performance of the modified early warning score in a Brazilian public hospital

Search

Search in:

Article type
book-review
book-review
brief-report
brief-report
case-report
case-report
correction
correction
letter
letter
other
other
research-article
research-article
retraction
retraction
review-article
review-article
Section
AUTHORS'S ANSWER
CASE STUDY
ERRATUM
EXPERIENCE REPORT
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
REFLECTION
RESEARCH
RESENHA
RETRACTION
REVIEW
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
Year / Volume
2024; v.77
2023; v.76
2022; v.75
2021; v.74
2020; v.73
2019; v.72
2018; v.71
2017; v.70
2016; v.69
2015; v.68
ISSUE