Workflow Archives - Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem

  • REVIEW07-10-2023

    Lean Six Sigma methodology to improve the discharge process in a Brazilian intensive care unit

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2023;76(3):e20220538

    Abstract

    REVIEW

    Lean Six Sigma methodology to improve the discharge process in a Brazilian intensive care unit

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2023;76(3):e20220538

    DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0538

    Views0

    ABSTRACT

    Objectives:

    to describe the Lean Six Sigma implementation process to improve the discharge process in a Brazilian health institution’s ICU.

    Methods:

    prospective study following the Define-Measure-Analyse-Improve-Control project development method. This method consists of five phases, namely: project definition, measurement of the starting point and data collection, analysis of results, improvement in processes, and statistical control.

    Results:

    applying Lean Six Sigma methodology following the Define-Measure-Analyse-Improve-Control in the discharge process from the intensive care unit to the inpatient unit was effective in improving processes. This improvement represented a reduction in the mean patient transfer time to the inpatient unit from 189 minutes to 75 minutes, representing a 61% improvement in discharge time.

    Conclusions:

    this article demonstrates the effectiveness of applying Lean Six Sigma methodology to improve the discharge flow in a critical unit, resulting in time and waste reduction.

    See more
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Lean Six Sigma methodology to improve the discharge process in a Brazilian intensive care unit

Search

Search in:

Article type
Article type
book-review
brief-report
case-report
case-report
correction
correction
editorial
letter
letter
other
other
research-article
research-article
retraction
review-article
review-article
Section
Section
AUTHORS'S ANSWER
CASE STUDY
EDITORIAL
ERRATUM
EXPERIENCE REPORT
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
REFLECTION
RESEARCH
RETRACTION
REVIEW
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
Year / Volume
Year / Volume
2024; v.77
2023; v.76
2022; v.75
2021; v.74
2020; v.73
2019; v.72
2018; v.71
2017; v.70
2016; v.69
2015; v.68
ISSUE
ISSUE